More Sustainability News
Y2K & Environmental News
Date sent: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:20:38 +0000 From: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sustainability Counts To: RP CINETThe indicators are an important step forward, but as usual there is much more work to be done. In particular, we need to develop measures of poverty and start measuring (and therefore promoting) the new economy. This includes small scale, people centred and environmentally friendly activities such as local trading, credit unions often triggered by encouraging participation. Below is NEF's response to the strategy. Response to Sustainability Counts Consultation document New Economics Foundation Introduction The New Economics Foundations welcomes the headline set of national indicators. This basket of indicators represents a significant step forward in building sustainable development in the UK. The work cannot stop here. The indicators need to be strengthened and integrated with the everyday decision making of citizens and government alike. We eagerly anticipate the full set of indicators to be launched in the Spring and hope that these and the new Sustainable Development Strategy, to be launched at the same time, help to establish sustainable development as a national priority. Encouraging Action The indicators must be for action. In order to do this they need to engage citizens, households, local authorities, business and government itself, in sustainable behaviour. One of the key aspects to this is that the indicators need to be meaningful to the actors mentioned above. For some of the indicators this dimension can be improved. For example, waste and waste disposal has no breakdown into critical sectors such as household and business. As a result, the indicator looks favourable and fails to highlight the relatively small percentage of waste that is recycled from households and the need to target this area. Targets are essential if the indicators are to drive change. Emissions of greenhouse gases contains such a target and this is excellent. However, in most cases targets are missing. We would encourage the use of targets where possible, or other devices that help to focus on the issue. For example benchmarks could be used to contextualise some of the indicators. How, for example, do the expected years of healthy life in the UK vary from that in other EU countries? Another device would involve attaching action points to each of the indicators, to enhance them. There might be action points for households, business and local, regional and national government. Greenhouse gases and air pollution might be particularly conducive to this kind of treatment. The balance of the indicators The balance of the indicators is critical in delivering sustainable development. Areas of continued challenge include the use of GDP. Exercises such as the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare highlight the ambiguity of GDP as an indicator of progress. The headline set of indicators need to make this ambiguity clear. Work around tools such as the ISEW should continue to inform the work of DETR and offer a snapshot of sustainability that cannot easily grasped from thirteen separate indicators. A related point is the absence, from the list, of indicators of the New Economy. This covers activities that offer considerable hope for sustainable development. Organic farming, Local Exchange Trading Systems, Credit Unions and a host of other activities contribute to social, environmental and economic progress. These activities are small but vigorous and growing. Developing indicators for this sector will help to validate and encourage it. The indicators of social progress do cover the basics of human development, however there are many aspects of social progress: community, voluntarism access to key goods and services. These too need to be covered, as does poverty. Overall the set of indicators are not ones that will be resonant with the public. An excellent exception is the `bad air day'. Efforts should be made to make the indicators more accessible to the public, for example through public education campaigns. The attempt to make the indicators policy resonant is understandable, but a formal mechanism is required to do this. For example, is it possible to ascribe sole or joint ownership of indicators to government departments?. It is only with this kind of ownership that the indicators will focus the mind of government and will not be allowed to `fall through the cracks'. As importantly, key policy events such as the Budget and the Public Spending Round need to be judged in terms of the indicators. For example one criteria for allocating money to a government department should be the degree to which their actions are focused on sustainable development as articulated in the indicators and elsewhere. Conclusions The DETR is to be congratulated for its excellent efforts so far. We have been happy to play our part in this important work. However key challenges remain. In particular there is a need for further development of indicators of social progress and the new economy. The buy-in of citizens and government departments beyond the DETR should also be a focus of attention for the next phase of this work. ______________________________ Reply Separator ____________________________ _____ Subject: Sustainability Counts Author: Craig Simmons at NEFMAIL Date: 27/01/99 22:38 Those working on sustainability indicators in the US may be interested to learn of what the UK Government is planning. They are just finishing consultation on a set of 13 headline indicators. The document is called 'Sustainability Counts'. A bit of a mixed bag and no particular surprises - but probably worth a look for those exploring how to whittle down a mammoth set of indicators to a few meaningful ones. http://www.environment.detr.gov.uk/sustainable/consult/index.htm For those interested, I can also send you a copy of BFF's brief response to the consultation (we were also involved in the preliminary work and are referenced in the document). Global greetings. Craig Simmons Best Foot Forward Limited Oxford Centre for Innovation, Oxford OX2 0JX, UK. email: [email protected] web: www.bestfootforward.com 'the problem with land is that they stopped making it some time ago' - Mark Twain More Sustainability News
Y2K & Environmental News
Website maintained by Michael R. Meuser
Copyright � 1996-2009 MapCruzin.com